As an effort to offer previously posted texts on GMO risk assessment in the Brazilian context written in English to the readers, we listed them below.
1. What is a LMO/GMO “not likely to have adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health”? - http://genpeace.blogspot.com.br/2012/04/what-is-lmogmo-not-likely-to-have.html
2. Brazil officially rejects Séralini´s results – no risk assessment revision is being suggested for NK603 maize - http://genpeace.blogspot.com.br/2012/10/brazil-officially-rejects-seralinis.html
3. On Omics for GMO risk assessment - http://genpeace.blogspot.com.br/2013/04/on-omics-for-risk-assessment.html
4. Comments on the AHTEG´S Guidance on risk assessment of living modified organisms (CBD/BCH, transgenic plants, LMO, GMO) - http://genpeace.blogspot.com.br/2012/06/comments-on-ahtegs-guidance-on-risk.html
5. On the 'forgotten" gene that could be harmful in transgenic plants: regulators did not miss it - http://genpeace.blogspot.com.br/2013/03/on-forgotten-gene-that-could-be-harmful.html
6. Basics on small RNAs: transgenic beans, papayas, tomatoes, etc. - http://genpeace.blogspot.com.br/2013/08/basics-on-small-rnas-transgenic-beans.html
7. A clumsy attempt to discredit good papers in order to safeguard Séralini and other fake scientists. Comments on http://gmoseralini.org/lets-give-the-scientific-literature-a-good-clean-up/ - http://genpeace.blogspot.com.br/2014/01/a-clumsy-attempt-to-discredit-good.html
8. No need for scientific consensus on GMO safety: how science is constructed and how risk assessment is made – http://genpeace.blogspot.com.br/2013/10/no-need-for-scientific-consensus-on-gmo.html
9. The largest “experiment” with human beings and livestock, ever! Contrary to the alarmists´ opinions, GM food seems to be very safe - http://genpeace.blogspot.com.br/2012/10/the-largest-experiment-with-human.html
10. Reply to GMWatch´s 10 reasons why we don´t need GM foods - http://genpeace.blogspot.com.br/2013/04/reply-to-gmwatchs-10-reasons-why-we.html
11. Failure to demonstrate any harm from Cry proteins on mice: comments on Mezzomo et al., 2013 - http://genpeace.blogspot.com.br/2013/06/failure-to-demonstrate-any-harm-from.html
12. Brazil´s new post release monitoring system for GMOs - http://genpeace.blogspot.com.br/2011/12/brazils-new-post-release-monitoring.html
13. CTNBio: rigor and transparency on GMO biosafety assessment in Brazil - http://genpeace.blogspot.com.br/2013/09/ctnbio-rigor-and-transparency-on-gmo.html
14. Is Seralini´s paper a dead horse? Should be, but now it is kind of a zombie, every time and again resurrected by the most stubborn GMO opposition - http://genpeace.blogspot.com.br/2013/09/is-seralinis-paper-dead-horse-should-be.html
Identifying LMOs that pose no risks for either health or the environment: http://genpeace.blogspot.com.br/2012/04/identifying-living-modified-organisms.html
For a general view of the Brazilian regulatory scenario, see also:
The Brazilian GMO Regulatory Scenario and the Adoption of Agricultural Biotechnology http://worldfoodscience.com/article/brazilian-gmo-regulatory-scenario-and-adoption-agricultural-biotechnology
Transgenic Res. 2014 Mar 23. [Epub ahead of print]
Post-release monitoring: the Brazilian system, its aims and requirements for information.
Andrade PP1, Melo MA, Kido EA.